Sometimes they are more busy. The criteria for publication of scientific papers (Articles) in Nature are that they: Further editorial criteria may be applicable for different kinds of papers, as follows: Articles published in Nature have an exceptionally wide impact, both among scientists and, frequently, among the general public. ensure that the figures and tables are clear and will fit in the space available. What could this mean? . In light of such uncertainty, the threshold for reversing a decision must be set well above the level of 'noise' in the process: otherwise, decisions would simply go back and forth endlessly in a kind of Brownian motion. The paper is accepted for publication without any further changes required from the authors. To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader. This is also the time for the "desk review by the editor," though, and so it probably took 2 weeks for the editor to decide to decline it. Should I write to the editor or wait for a response/change in status? rev2023.3.3.43278. Many submissions are declined without being sent for review. Your manuscript is already in great shape but please go through our guidelines below that specify the correct formatting of your final resubmission to avoid delays towards formal acceptance. HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses. This will reduce delays. Sometimes they are more busy. and JavaScript. #AcademicChatter" Is there a single-word adjective for "having exceptionally strong moral principles"? Can I ask the editor to publish a withdrawn manuscript after acceptance? Editing and proofreading services for a publication-ready manuscript, Customized service packs to match all publication needs, Expert help for all academic translation needs. Hello. Editor rejected manuscript claiming it is similar to a not-yet-published manuscript (that I haven't seen). If an author wishes to appeal against Nature's decision, the appeal must be made in writing, not by telephone, and should be confined to the scientific case for publication. 117. Allegations of referee bias are seldom persuasive unless substantiated by strong evidence; we presume our referees are acting in good faith unless proved otherwise, and having sought their advice, we feel an obligation to take it seriously. Currently working as an Assistant Editor for the Discover Journals under Springer Nature. 2022.5.11 Manuscript under submission/Manuscript received, 2022.5.12 Editor assigned/Manuscript under consideration, 6.2Manuscript under considerationNS, Decision sent to author, NZip for reviewers, 9All Reviewers Assigned109Manuscript under consideration, 2022.10.10 Manuscript under consideration/Decision sent to author/Waiting for revision, , comments, #1, #2, #3IMEC&, 2022.11.23 Manuscript under submission/Manuscript received/Editor assigned/Manuscript under consideration (), 2022.11.25 Editor Decision Started (All Reviewer Assigned), 1212All Reviewer AssignedManuscript under consideration, 2022.12.13 Manuscript under consideration/Decision sent to author/Waiting for revision, #1hhhh, #3comment. After the Editor in Chief assigns the manuscript to an editor, the next task is "waiting for reviewer assignment" by that assigned editor. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. I am at the same stage. While editing corrects the structure of your article whereas a peer reviewer gives you an extensive analysis. (You are not allowed to say "Gamma" unless you give a shape and scale parameter). Authors are provided with an encrypted link to this system after their paper has been accepted. paper acceptance probability in case of long peer review time for the 1st decision. The Editor-in-Chief (EiC) makes the final decision on manuscript, with the associate editor (AE) making the initial decision. ISSN 0028-0836 (print), report original scientific research (the main results and conclusions must not have been published or submitted elsewhere). New referees can often raise new sets of points, which complicates and lengthens the consideration process instead of simplifying it. If the editor is satisfied with your work, they will choose appropriate peer reviewers to evaluate your work, taking into account several factors including expertise, experience and apparent conflicts of interest. typoresubmitstagedecision sent to author&, proofproofnaturepublish, ScienceNatureScienceScience, Editor assigned (Peer-review) (discovery) (invention)novelunexpected)The criteria for a paper to be sent for peer-review are that the results seem novel, arresting (illuminating, unexpected or surprising), and that the work described has both immediate and far-reaching implicationsnaturescienceBoard of Reviewing EditorsscienceBoard of Reviewing EditorsBoard of Reviewing EditorsnaturescienceBoard of Reviewing Editorsscienceconnection, 22, Peer-review, Peer-review, 2. youre still in the running. Editors decisions are weighted according to the expertise of the referees, and not by a voting procedure. If a paper was considered insufficiently novel or interesting to merit high-profile publication, we are unlikely to reconsider simply because the authors disagree. //--> It can impact your confidence and make you question your ability and skill. We understand your anxiety :-) However, the decision on manuscript acceptance depends on several factors, such as availability and responsiveness of peer reviewers and the extent of revisions recommended. In all these cases, it is likely that some time will elapse before Nature can respond, and the paper must not be submitted for publication elsewhere during this time. [CDATA[// > I was shocked and disappointed by your rejection letter, authors write, hundreds of times each year, I must ask that you reconsider your decision. Rejection is of course a fact of life for all scientists, particularly when they submit their work to highly selective journals; in less than five years since its inception, Nature Neuroscience, for example, has turned away over 6000 manuscripts, roughly 90% of all submissions. Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. on 14 Jul, 2020, This content belongs to the Journal submission & peer review Stage. Performance & security by Cloudflare. ensure that the terminology and notation conform to. Register for comprehensive research tips and expert advice on English writing, journal publishing, good publication practices, trends in publishing, and a lot more. //--> Answer: The status Decision in process after Under review means that all the reviews have come in and the editor is evaluating your paper based on the reviewers comments. Referees are chosen for the following reasons: Although Nature's editors themselves judge whether a paper is likely to interest readers outside its own immediate field, referees often give helpful advice, for example if the work described is not as significant as the editors thought or has undersold its significance. The handbookis available from R Upskill, a sister brand providing learning programs for various aspects of a researchers work, including writing, submission, publication, and research promotion. In a perfect world, we would consult with dozens of experts, who would spend many hours considering every point in the manuscript.

What Happens After 28 Days Bail, Streator Il Shooting Today, Rita Mohr Gibbsboro, Keto Approved Sausage Brands, Articles E